There’s been criticism for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) over its latest AR5 report from many quarters for many reasons. But today there’s new research focusing on one particular aspect of that criticism.
The particular part of the IPCC’s science in question is its accounting for the effects of changes in the Sun on the climate of planet Earth. Many climatologists have long sought to suggest that the effects of solar variability are minor, certainly when compared to those of human-driven CO2 emissions. Others, however, while admitting that the Sun changes only a very little over human timescales, think that it might be an important factor.
This matters because solar physicists think that the Sun is about to enter a “grand minimum”, a prolonged period of low activity.
The current 11-year peak in solar action is the weakest seen for a long time, and it may presage a lengthy quiet period. Previously, historical records suggest that such periods have been accompanied by chilly conditions on Earth – perhaps to the point where a coming minimum might counteract or even render irrelevant humanity’s carbon emissions. The “Little Ice Age” seen from the 15th to the 19th centuries is often mentioned in this context.
READ FULL ARTICLE ON
Related articles
- Scientists to IPCC: YES, solar quiet spells like the one now looming CAN mean ICE AGES (sott.net)
- YES, solar minimums – like the one now looming – CAN cause ICE AGES, say Swiss scientists (iceagenow.info)
- IPCC Dogmatists Under Fire: Little Ice Age May Be Due To Changes In Solar Activity: Swiss scientists now say that the Little Ice Age most certainly could have been triggered by variations in solar activity’ (climatedepot.com)
- I What Is Happening On The Sun? (climatedepot.com)
- Could Earth be actually due for a “mini-ice age? (theboldcorsicanflame.wordpress.com)
- Sea-ice formation sustained the ‘Little Ice Age’ (phys.org)